“Medium is the
message” is an idea of McLuhan, that to delimit the character of the elements
in a communication and the relationships between them.The elements in a communication include the idea
of the sender’s mind, the content the sender create, the channel (the medium)
between the sender and receiver, etc.
According to
McLuhan’s idea, message receiver can already get something about the message
via the medium before they decode the content. Taking the movie as a reference,
McLuhan said that movie is meaning a concept, which is a transformation of
speed and time. Therefore, the audience can know that the movie is going to
bring them the story and a deeper meaning message behind the story by a transforming
the speed and time of the content before they get into the cinema and watch the
movie.
However, I am only agreeing
with a half of McLuhan’s idea. The message receiver CANNOT get anything about
the message through the medium before they decode the content. They can only know
how the medium brings them the message in the coming time at most. To explain
my idea with a practical example, there is a film call “SPY” I watched in the
summer. While my friend date my to watch this film, I have no idea about how
will be the story and the message behind look like. Until I saw the poster in
the box office of the cinema, I know that it is a comedy of a clumsy lady who
works as a police or FBI as I saw her taking gun in the poster. After around
two hours, I finish watching the film, I watched the whole story and get the
deeper message behind. That is “Never underestimate yourself and to be hopeful
when challenge comes.” I can’t know anything about this big message before I
watch the film. This is the reason for why I am only agreeing with a half of
McLuhan’s idea, while I understand his explanation of movie is transforming the
speed and time of the content. In fact, this concept of movie means nothing of
every movie of there content and the deeper message.
Besides, McLuhan point out that the medium influences that how the message is perceived. I disagree with it! To have a sample example, no matter the lecturer tell me the details about the home work in which way, such as email, whatsapp, printed notes, announce on the lesson, etc. I will also see the home work as an important thing to do and do it seriously.
At these two points
of view of McLuhan, I have different opinion with him. I think that the content
means more then the medium in these two cases. Nevertheless, McLuhan have many
others idea and theory in the big idea “Medium is the message”, maybe we can
discuss wider and deeper in the future.
Student Name: Tsang CheukWah
Dear Ica, I am glad that you can put forth your opinions by questioning the proposition of the "medium is the message." In order to make your argument clearer, you can try to state that media form and media content cannot be understood and examined separately.This is a strong argument and you illustrate this in your example. Nice.
ReplyDelete