We learn
the theory of Technological determinism and the Social Shaping of Technology
this week. I think I agree with the Social Shaping of theory more than the Technological
determinism. Let me define what the Social Shaping of theory first. The Social
Shaping theory is the social need or social forces will affect the technology.
It likes an antidote to naïve technological determinism. For example, electronic
dictionary was popular in last 5 to 10 years. But there are few of new version
electronic dictionaries or new products nowadays. It‘s because people did not
need this so much. People can use their smart phone to do this. So the electronic
dictionary is not popular now.
Here is another example, on the iPhone
Presentation in 2007 by Steve Jobs, he said why he created iPhone was because
he wanted the three of Apple Inc. revolutionary products to combine in one
product. Before iPhone, people want to surf the Internet on computer. If people
need to listen music they need the music player and the mobile phone before
iPhone can only do a few of things. Because of the Social Shaping of
Technology, the technology we have is that someone has decided what we need. In
this case, Steve Jobs decided what the social need was we can do these things
in one device. So Steve Jobs combined these and created iPhone.
And nowadays there are lots of people
using iPhone all over the world, so iPhone keep upgrading because social want
iPhone can do more and more. So iPhone keep upgrading and have more new function
like Siri. So I think the social need and want are forcing the improvement of technology.
That is the reason I agree the Social Shaping of Technology.
Student Name: Law Hoi Yin Billy
Dear Billy, Your view is precisely stated in the article. Nice. Proper examples are also cited to support your view. When SST is discussed, you can also take a network of factors (e.g. social and cultural) into account. How do they shape the invention of technology? This could also help us go beyond the technological determinism, which you don't agree in the article.
ReplyDelete